Private Credit for Private Investors

Once described as “alternative lending”, private credit today is becoming more mainstream as an asset class with access increasingly offered to private investors. The expansion has been largely a US phenomenon, but with disappointing growth equity markets, investors with a higher risk appetite are increasingly seeking access to this sector. This article explores what is meant by private credit as well as the different options available to private investors in the UK.  

What is it? Why has it grown?

Private credit describes loans made outside the banking system, but which are not structured as bonds and are not publicly traded. It is a broad definition that encompasses direct lending, mezzanine, asset-backed lending as well as leveraged buyout, real estate debt and infrastructure debt.  

The sector developed after the global financial crisis (GFC, 2008), when new banking regulations such as Basel III made many kinds of riskier and leveraged lending less attractive or more expensive for banks. This left a funding gap, especially for middle-market firms or leveraged buyouts, or where bespoke financing was needed. 

Since then, the asset class has grown dramatically, particularly in the US where, by the end of 2023 according to McKinsey, it was nearly ten times larger than it was in 2009. Total assets are now near US$2 trillion. 

Although the size of the asset class in the UK has been much smaller, the recent growth has been equally strong, particularly in areas like real estate-backed lending and mid-market corporate credit. Asset managers and pension funds have been increasing their allocations as they seek low correlation from the traditional markets, more predictable cash flows and yields. 

Returns so far have been good – over the past two decades to December 2024, private credit in the US has delivered higher annualised returns relative to global high-yield bonds. 

How can Private Investors get involved?

Historically, private credit has been accessible only to large institutional investors (pension funds, endowments, sovereign wealth funds) who can manage the closed-ended features (often 10+ years), high minimum investments (e.g. $5-10 million) and regulatory and legal barriers. Options for private investors have been limited to P2P (peer-to-peer) lending platforms.  These have been successful in disintermediating banks, however they have often fallen short with regard to credit risk management and regulatory oversight, which has led to mis-selling, inadequate disclosure and even fraud. Several high-profile failures have tarnished the sector’s reputation. It has been difficult for surviving platforms to retain credibility, secure institutional funding, or attract a broad retail investor base. 

However, things are changing, for example with the recent emergence of “semi-liquid” or “evergreen” funds, which are open-ended with more frequent redemption windows (often quarterly) and lower minimum investments (in some cases ~£10,000).  

In both the UK and EU, there is a regulatory interest in broadening access to private markets. The new LTAF (Long Term Asset Fund) UK regulatory structure, which would potentially enable smaller investors to access private credit, is intended to be opened to ISA investors from April 2026. However, to date the limited number of funds launched in the UK have been focussed on private equity and on infrastructure investment, or they have been designed to be marketed to pension funds. Aviva’s Multi-Sector Private Debt LTAF for example, launched in January 2025, was seeded with £750m from their own managed pool of pension fund money, and is being offered to other pension funds but is not available to private investors. It is also unclear whether the main investment platforms will find it easy to offer funds without daily liquidity. 

How do LGB’s MTN Programmes fit in?

LGB’s Medium Term Note (MTN) programmes provide investors with access to fixed income opportunities that are often direct and bespoke in nature. Much like private credit funds, MTNs bypass traditional bank channels, enabling corporates to raise capital through tailor-made debt issuance. 

Their common issue terms and collateral arrangements enable MTNs to be a good starting point for investors seeking to establish a private credit portfolio.  Investors can tap into regular deal flow and add to their holdings progressively as they become familiar with the issuance process and the issuers in question.  

LGB Capital Markets conducts extensive due diligence and monitors the financial health of issuers, who set up programmes for capital requirements over the long term. This deep and ongoing relationship with corporate issuers allows a thorough, continuous understanding of how these businesses perform and evolve, as well as an opportunity to spot any red flags early on. Importantly, experienced investors are invited to meet with issuers on a regular basis, providing further due diligence as well as an exhaustive understanding from these investors of the investment proposition. 

Investors are encouraged to build laddered portfolios of issues, using the regular proprietary deal flow to diversify risk by issuer but also by maturity. This allows investors to build robust portfolios that generate regular income and have redemptions at different times, giving the investors important cash flow to meet any liability requirements without depending on secondary markets. This strategy has proven to create attractive returns over time through compounding interest, a concept which Einstein described as the eighth wonder of the world. 

Risk of Private Credit

The absence of a public market in private credit instruments presents a liquidity risk.  Investors have to create liquidity through the structure of their portfolios and the cash flow profile of their investments.  This is why the laddered portfolio concept is important. 

The second obvious risk given the private nature of the investments is a lack of information.  This could result in investors misjudging the robustness of a borrower or a transaction structure and taking equity risk in the form of debt.  Investors should allocate time to reading transaction material and participating in calls with borrowers if arranged.  Investors unable to do this should focus on managed funds. 

It may be easier than in the case of public bonds to “extend and pretend” when a borrower has run into trouble, and the lack of a mark-to-market may disguise underlying problems. Indeed, we are currently seeing in the First Brands bankruptcy in the USA a case of a company in part funded privately, coming rapidly unstuck. It seems – and the Financial Times has covered this extensively – that the mix of public and private loans the company had taken on through a highly complex capital structure were not all done with full disclosure to different counterparties.  

Equally LGB has also not been immune to events of default where the role of security trustee became critical for investor protection. Lessons include the need for proper covenants, full due diligence, performance monitoring, robust legal documentation and proper security structures. Investors on their end should ensure that they have fully read and understood the information on any particular investment proposition and are comfortable that the risk of the investment is within their appetite and tolerance.   

Conclusion

With banks becoming wholesale providers of credit and a wide range of intermediaries now managing relationships with borrowers, we can expect that the private investors will be given a broadening range of ways to access the private credit market.  Attractive returns are available to investors willing to manage the key risks of liquidity and a relative lack of information about borrowers and comparable transactions. 

LGB’s MTN programmes represent an appropriate starting point for investors new to the asset class.  They are designed specifically for UK private investors, family offices and wealth managers with suitable denominations and minimum investment requirements. 

With regulators in the UK looking to broaden access to private market assets, MTNs already sit within a regulated capital markets framework, providing greater transparency and investor protection than some fund structures.